ChronexaRESERVE STUDIES · SIRS · CAPITAL PLANNING
Every reserve study firm has the same bottleneck: an hour of reporting for every hour on site. Photos get sorted by hand, field notes get retyped, costs get looked up, and the 30-year plan gets rebuilt in a spreadsheet. We built the engine that does that work, so your analysts start at review instead of data entry.
Your template, your branding, your credential on the report.The engine drafts. Your reserve specialist or engineer reviews, edits and signs.
Choose an action to see what it writes back across your systems.
01 / WHERE THE HOURS GO
These are the four places the work leaks most often. Most firms have at least two of them running right now.
Photos land in a folder, notes sit on an iPad, and someone has to match each one to a component before any real analysis begins.
With an hour of reporting for every hour on site, a busy season means turning work away or making clients wait, even when the inspectors have time.
Florida's structural integrity reserve studies and New Jersey's five-year requirement added work faster than the number of people qualified to sign it.
Spreadsheet funding models get copied from study to study. A single wrong reference changes a contribution that a board will vote on.
02 / WHERE IT PAYS BACK
Ranked by how fast they usually pay back. The free audit puts your own numbers in the last column.
| Use case | Today | With Chronexa | Typical impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Photo sorting | An analyst drags 200 photos into component folders | Photos matched to components and tagged by condition on upload | 90%less sorting time |
| Field note entry | Handwritten notes retyped into the inventory | Notes read and turned into inventory rows with the source page attached | 4 to 6 hrssaved per study |
| Costing and lives | Unit costs and useful lives looked up per component | Pulled from your cost library and standards automatically | Minutesinstead of hours |
| Funding plans | Spreadsheet rebuilt for each scenario | Baseline, threshold and full funding solved and compared instantly | Secondsper scenario |
| Report writing | Narrative and tables assembled by hand | A branded draft in your template, ready for review | Days to hoursper report |
Typical results from systems we have delivered and comparable deployments. Your audit replaces them with your own numbers.
03 / HOW IT FITS YOUR FIRM
We connect what you already run first. APIs where they exist, MCP servers and careful automation where they do not.
04 / THE CONTROLS
The controls are designed in from the first workflow, not added after something goes wrong.
Fully funded balance, percent funded and every funding plan are calculated by tested code. AI never produces a number that goes into a funding table.
Unreadable notes, unmatched photos and unusual values go to your analyst with the reason attached, instead of being filled in.
The engine prepares a draft. A reserve specialist, professional reserve analyst or engineer reviews and signs every study that leaves your firm.
05 / THE ENGAGEMENT
Scope, what counts as working, and the price. Built in your own accounts, documented and exportable. The free audit comes first, and so does the first workflow.
RELEVANT WORK
We built this engine with input from people who prepare reserve studies for a living, and tested it against studies they had already delivered: the same component logic, the same funding method and the same report structure.
Their verdict on the drafts was that the quality was on par with their own work, produced in a fraction of the time. We do not name clients, but we are happy to run the same side-by-side on one of your finished studies.
06 / START WITH ONE WORKFLOW
On a short call we walk through how your firm builds a study today. Then we draft one of your past studies from its original notes and photos, so you can compare our draft against what you delivered.
You will be talking to the engineers who would build it, not an account manager.info@chronexa.io
Rather write it down first?
A FEW GOOD QUESTIONS
It handles the work between the site visit and the review: reading handwritten field notes, sorting site photos to components, pulling costs and useful lives from your own tables, calculating the 30-year funding plans and drafting the report in your template. Your reserve specialist or engineer still inspects the property, reviews the draft and signs the study.
No. Many firms keep their existing tool and use the engine for intake and drafting only, exporting the finished inventory into the software they already use. Others move the whole workflow over. We set it up the way your firm already works.
No. Fully funded balance, percent funded and every funding plan are calculated by tested code using the standard cash flow method. AI is used only to read notes and photos and to draft narrative text. Numbers that go into a board's budget are never generated by a language model.
Yes. The structural integrity reserve study components, Florida's funding rules and New Jersey's 30-year projection requirement are configured as part of your report template and funding settings. The professional who signs remains responsible for the study meeting the statute.
It stays in your account, and if you need it to stay in your own cloud we deploy there. Client data is never used to train a public model, access follows your team roles, and every change to a study is logged.
There are no packages. We start with a free side-by-side draft of one of your finished studies. After that, pricing is per study or a monthly plan based on your volume, and you approve it in writing before anything else starts.