Due diligence & contract review
AI reads contracts and filings, flags risk clauses, and writes structured findings back into iManage or NetDocuments.
60–80% less manual review time per matter
Use case · By industry
The document review, contract review and due-diligence work firms currently send to outsourced reviewers or an LPO, done instead by a private AI system that runs inside your own environment — plus regulatory intelligence and legal RAG over your matters and precedents.
Legal AI automation puts custom AI to work on a law firm’s highest-volume manual work — document review, contract review and due diligence, monitoring regulators for relevant changes, and answering questions across your matters and precedents through a private RAG system — all inside a deployment you control, with a full audit trail on every action.
See it run
This is the engine class this page describes, running: regulatory alerts matched to matters, knowledge answered with citations, billing caught before it leaks. Illustrative run — the build is always yours.
The problem
A regulated practice runs on two things generic AI tools cannot touch: confidential client data that legally cannot leave systems you control, and a body of knowledge — matters, precedents, regulatory positions — that no public model has ever seen. A ChatGPT subscription cannot read your matter history, and it certainly cannot be trusted with privileged documents.
So the manual work stays manual. Analysts spend their day watching regulator websites for circulars that might affect a live matter. Associates re-read the same contracts to pull the same clauses. The knowledge sits in a DMS that can store a document but cannot answer a question about it. Capacity is capped by headcount, and the firm reviews fewer matters than it could.
Proof
Regulatory feeds matched to live matters automatically, with response drafts prepared for lawyer review — so the firm answers in hours, not weeks, and nothing in scope slips past.
What we automate
AI reads contracts and filings, flags risk clauses, and writes structured findings back into iManage or NetDocuments.
60–80% less manual review time per matter
Incoming documents are auto-classified and routed to the right matter and team without paralegal triage.
Hours saved on every new matter
Every extraction is logged and reviewable inside your existing security perimeter.
Audit-ready on every document
For one of the largest corporate litigation practices in India, the bottleneck was regulatory intelligence. Analysts manually monitored a long list of government and regulator sources — SEBI, RBI, the stock exchanges, and sector circulars — then tried to connect each change back to the right live matter by hand. Slow, and easy to miss.
We built a regulatory-intelligence system that watches those sources continuously, classifies each new circular or order by relevance, maps it to the matters it actually affects, and surfaces it to the responsible team with the source attached. The matter and precedent knowledge lives in a private vector database, so the AI answers from the firm’s own context rather than guessing. The result: 90% less time spent on manual monitoring and a 5× faster internal response to regulatory change — with no document ever leaving the firm’s environment.
The core is a private RAG (retrieval-augmented generation) system. We ingest your matters, precedents, contracts and filings into a vector database, so an AI can retrieve the exact passage that answers a question and cite where it came from — instead of producing a confident hallucination. As matters close and precedents are added, the index relearns, so the system gets more useful over time rather than going stale.
On top of that sit the workflows that do the work: regulatory monitoring, contract and due-diligence extraction, matter intake, and clause-level risk flagging. Low-confidence items route to a human for review (human-in-the-loop), so accuracy improves without ever taking a lawyer out of the loop on the things that matter.
For a regulated firm, “where does the data live” is the first question, not the last. We deploy inside an environment you control — your cloud tenancy or a dedicated, isolated instance (OpenAI on Azure, a private model, or your own) — so privileged data never trains a public model and never leaves your boundary. Role-based access mirrors your matter-level permissions, and every AI action, extraction and answer is logged for a complete audit trail you can show a regulator or a client.
The same foundation powers document-heavy work. We deploy OCR and LLM extraction that parses contracts and filings, flags risk and liability clauses, tags metadata, and writes the structured result straight back into iManage or NetDocuments — building on your existing document management system instead of forcing a new platform on your associates. Due-diligence cycles drop from days to hours, and matter intake stops being a re-keying exercise.
Firms with review volume that outpaces headcount usually have one lever today: send the batch to an outsourced review vendor or an LPO and pay by the document or the hour. That works, but it means privileged material leaves the firm, turnaround depends on someone else's staffing, and the cost scales with volume forever.
This is a different lever, not a request to trust a vendor with client data. The first-pass read — flagging risk clauses, extracting key terms, surfacing what actually needs a lawyer's attention — happens inside your own environment, on your own DMS, with nothing sent externally. Associates review what the system flags as uncertain instead of every page of every document. It doesn't replace judgment on a matter that needs it; it removes the part of the batch that never needed a person in the first place.
Run your numbers
Most firms leak billable hours between matter work and the timesheet. Run your own numbers — the full breakdown lands in your inbox.
Most firms focus on Billable Hours. Elite firms focus on Realization Rate. The ABA benchmark for top-performing firms is 93%. Where does your firm stand?
Annual WIP Write-Down Exposure
$2.52M
Your firm is voluntarily burning $2.52M annually in revenue that was worked, entered, and then deleted before the bill went out.
$202k
Immediately recoverable by improving time-entry narrative quality with AI coaching
9.0pp below elite
The $1.42M/yr gap between your realization rate and the ABA 93% elite benchmark
The source of the leak: Partners delete time entries before billing when the narrative is vague — "Reviewing file" gets cut. "Analysis of Tort Claim precedents re: Martinez discovery dispute" gets paid. AI-coached narratives reduce write-downs by an average of 8 percentage points.
Download the Full Board Report — formatted to show your Partners and CFO
A complete breakdown of where the write-down loss is originating, which practice groups are most affected, and a 12-month recovery roadmap.
What it costs
Fixed-price, agreed before any code is written. Engagements run $10K–$150K depending on scope — most firms start with a single workflow at the lower end, and the audit that precedes it is free.
Our approach
We map the manual workflow — regulatory monitoring, review, intake — and agree the deployment and security model (your tenancy vs. a dedicated instance) before any build.
We load matters, precedents and documents into a private vector database, so the AI answers from your context, with citations.
Regulatory monitoring, RAG Q&A, contract extraction and risk-flagging — tuned to your practice areas, with human-in-the-loop on low-confidence items.
Go live inside your environment with role-based access and full audit trails; the index relearns as matters close and precedents are added.
Why a custom build beats off-the-shelf
No, and that distinction matters. An LPO sends your documents to a third party's staff to review. This keeps document review, contract review and due diligence inside your own environment — a private AI system does the first pass and your own team (or ours, under your supervision) handles anything it flags as uncertain. Nothing privileged leaves the firm.
It can reduce how much you need to send out. The system handles the first-pass read — extraction, risk-clause flagging, prioritization — so what actually goes to outside reviewers (or your own associates) is a smaller, better-triaged batch, not the full volume.
It lives where you decide — your own cloud tenancy or a dedicated, isolated instance (e.g. OpenAI on Azure, a private model, or your own). Privileged data never leaves that boundary and never trains a public model. We scope this before any build.
RAG (retrieval-augmented generation) means the AI retrieves the exact passage from your own matters or precedents and cites it, instead of guessing. A public chatbot has never seen your work and cannot be trusted with privileged documents — a private RAG system answers from your context, with an audit trail.
Yes — that is exactly the system we built for a top corporate litigation firm. It monitors regulator and exchange sources continuously, classifies each change by relevance, and maps it to the matters it affects, cutting manual monitoring time by ~90%.
Yes. We build on top of your current DMS rather than replacing it — your security model, folder structure and access controls stay intact.
We pair OCR/LLM extraction with validation rules and human-in-the-loop review for low-confidence items, so accuracy improves over time without taking a lawyer out of the loop.
A focused workflow goes live in 4–6 weeks; a full RAG-plus-monitoring system is typically 8–12 weeks depending on the volume of matters to ingest and your security requirements.
Every engagement is priced to its own scope, so there is no list price. After a short discovery call we agree in writing what the system has to do and what it costs, before any build starts.
15 minutes to see if this is worth building for you — no pressure if it isn't.
Book a Discovery Call.