It collects the post from everywhere
Email, portals, shared folders, the photograph someone sent from site. Nothing waits to be gathered by hand.
Nothing missed into a late fee
Service
Invoices arrive from everywhere, get read by a person, typed into your accounting system, and chased around for approval. We build the system that does the reading, the matching and the chasing.
In short
Accounts payable automation replaces the manual handling of supplier invoices. Invoices are collected from wherever they arrive, read, checked against the purchase order or contract, and routed for approval based on rules you set. Anything that does not match, or falls outside the rules, stops and waits for a person. The result is that the finance team reviews exceptions rather than typing every line.
Works with the systems you already run
The problem
The invoice arrives. Somebody opens it, works out which supplier and which project, checks whether it matches what was ordered, types it into the accounting system, and then starts asking around for an approval. That last part alone can take a week, most of which is somebody waiting for somebody else to open an email.
None of those steps needs judgement most of the time. Judgement is needed when something does not match, and that is a small fraction of the post. The rest is routing.
It breaks in four places, and the people doing it feel every one.
There is no single inbox. Before anything can be processed, somebody has to gather them from four places, and the one that gets missed is the one that turns into a late payment charge.
Line by line, against a purchase order in another system, or against a contract nobody can find. It is slow, and it is where the duplicate payments slip through.
Forwarded, forgotten, chased, forwarded again. The approver is not being difficult, they are just busy, and nothing in the process makes this the thing they open first.
The queue that was manageable on the fifteenth is a crisis on the thirtieth, and the accruals get estimated because there is no time to process properly.
What changes
Invoices are gathered by hand from four different places.
They are collected automatically, wherever they arrive.
Someone checks each one against the order, line by line.
Matches are confirmed automatically, mismatches stop for review.
Approval takes a week of chasing.
It routes by rule and escalates on its own if it stalls.
Month end is a scramble and accruals get estimated.
The queue stays flat, so month end looks like every other week.
What we build
Email, portals, shared folders, the photograph someone sent from site. Nothing waits to be gathered by hand.
Nothing missed into a late fee
Line by line against the purchase order or contract, with anything that disagrees held back.
Duplicates caught before payment
Routed by your own delegation rules, escalating on its own when it stalls in somebody's inbox.
A week of chasing becomes a day
Into your accounting system, with a trail showing what was read, matched and approved by whom.
Month end stops being a scramble
Proof
The same approach applies whatever the document is. Collect it from wherever it lands, read it, check it against what it should match, and route it by your rules. What differs between finance teams is the rules and the tolerances, which is why those get written down before anything gets built.
How it works
Including the awkward ones. The supplier who sends a photograph, the one whose layout changed, the credit notes. Those decide whether this works.
A written report on what was read correctly and what was not, before anything is built. That report becomes the standard the work is measured against.
What counts as a match, what tolerance is acceptable, who approves what and at what value. Your rules, written down and applied consistently.
Your team keeps processing normally while the system runs alongside. Nothing posts for real until the two agree.
Confidence & control
Scope
Scope, timeline and price are agreed after a short call, never before. We write down what the system has to do, and what it costs, before any build starts.
Questions
No, and we would push back on anyone who offered that. It reads, matches, routes for approval and posts once approved. Releasing money stays a human decision with your bank, because the failure mode on the other side of that line is severe.
It is the normal situation and it is the reason off-the-shelf tools get abandoned. We work from a month of your real post, awkward suppliers included, and show you what was read correctly before you commit to anything.
It stops and goes to a person with both documents side by side and the difference highlighted. That queue is the point of the system. A mismatch that gets quietly accepted is worse than one that never got checked.
Yes, but they need to be in the sample. Those cases carry the rules that matter, and a system built only on clean invoices will fall over on the first credit note.
In most cases. We would confirm on the call before quoting rather than after. The system posts into what you already run, so nothing about your close process needs to change.
Every engagement is priced to its own scope, so there is no list price. After a short discovery call we agree in writing what the system has to do and what it costs, before any build starts.
Related

Bring us the workflow that keeps eating your team's week.
The audit is free. If we can't find automation worth more than it costs to build, you owe us nothing, and you keep the roadmap.
Prefer email? info@chronexa.io
We'll review your workflows and come back with where AI saves the most time and cost.