How Do CPAs Rate Tax Software on Integration? 2026 Survey Data

CPAs like their tax software. The 2026 tax software survey in the Journal of Accountancy and The Tax Adviser makes that clear, and anyone who tells you the engines are broken has not read it. What the same survey shows, and what gets less attention, is that the grade drops when you ask how well that software works with everything else.

I read the survey and the vendors' own integration pages so you do not have to. Below is what the numbers say, what they cannot say, and what I would ask before buying anything that claims to connect to your tax package.

Here is what matters most:

• The survey covered 1,808 AICPA members who prepared 2025 returns for a fee. Responses were gathered June 1 to 19, 2026.
• Drake Tax and Lacerte tied for the top overall rating at 4.4. CCH Axcess Tax had the lowest overall rating of the products the article names, at 4.0.
• On "integration with other software", the best score the article reports is UltraTax CS at 3.4. ATX trailed at 2.9. On data import, only UltraTax CS (3.5) beat the all-product average of 3.4.
• The survey does not say which programs respondents had in mind when they scored integration, so read these as relative scores, not a grade for any one connection.
• Vendor pages describe what a connection does in specific terms. Firm360 describes document sync with several tax packages. Karbon's integrations page names different tax tools. Neither is the same as a return's status moving on its own.

What the survey measured

The survey comes from the Journal of Accountancy and The Tax Adviser, both AICPA publications. Of the 1,808 respondents, the largest groups used UltraTax CS (22.3%), Lacerte (16.7%), Drake Tax (14.3%), CCH Axcess Tax (13.8%), ProSeries (11%) and CCH ProSystem fx (7.6%), with ATX at 4.6%.

Overall ratings were strong. Drake Tax and Lacerte both scored 4.4, and CCH Axcess Tax scored 4.0, the lowest of the products the article discusses. The article states that 5 is the most favorable score for that overall question. It does not restate the scale for the import and integration questions, so I treat those as scores on the same kind of scale and nothing more.

On ease of use, ATX, Drake Tax, Lacerte and ProSeries all scored 4.4, while CCH Axcess Tax scored 3.6. Close to three-quarters of respondents needed technical support at some point, and Drake Tax received the top support ratings (4.2 for quality, 4.3 for ease of getting help).

Now the two questions this article is about.

On importing data, "only UltraTax CS with 3.5 exceeded (and only slightly) the all-products average of 3.4." ATX scored 3.0.

On integration, the survey reports that "ATX also trailed on the integration question with 2.9, where again, UltraTax CS led with 3.4."

The gap that the averages hide

Put the numbers side by side and the shape is plain. The best overall scores are 4.4. The best integration score the article reports is 3.4. These are different products on different questions, so this is not a clean subtraction. It is still a full point between how well the leading products are rated and how well the best-rated one is said to connect with other software.

That matches a quieter finding from the AICPA's 2026 Top Issues Survey, which asked 629 firms in April and May. It ranked managing technology and AI change as the leading issue by expected impact over the next five years. In the 101 to 500 employee group, technology adoption and integration ranked just ahead of changes in technology and AI among current concerns. The AICPA's Lisa Simpson said the survey showed "challenges with integrating technology and leveraging it to enhance service offerings."

Two separate AICPA-published surveys, asking different questions of different people, point at the same place. Firms trust the tax engine. They struggle with what surrounds it.

I want to be careful here, because this is where posts like this one usually overreach. The survey does not say firms are losing money on integration. It does not say how many hours go into re-keying data. It says that when CPAs were asked to score integration, the numbers were the weakest of the ratings the article reports. Anything beyond that is inference, and I will label it as such.

One thing the survey does tell you about your own setup

The survey also records where the software runs. About 92.3% of CCH Axcess Tax users confirmed its advertised cloud operation. More than 94% of ATX and CCH ProSystem fx users ran the product on their own drive or network.

That matters for integration because a program that runs on a local drive cannot be reached from the outside in the same way a hosted one can. Whether your tax package is hosted or installed changes what a connection can realistically do. Ask your vendor and your hosting provider which you actually have, because many firms assume.

What vendors say their connections do

A rating tells you how people feel. A vendor's page tells you what the vendor is willing to commit to in writing. I read two practice management vendors' integration pages on November 1, 2026.

Firm360. Its integrations page says its FileSync tool will "automatically sync documents with UltraTax", and says the same for Lacerte, Drake and CCH (the page spells it "CCH Access"). Setup requires each user to install FileSync and enter a unique token, and client names and IDs must match exactly between the two systems. The page describes documents moving. It does not mention return status for any of the tax products. It also lists a separate feature, AutoPrep, which sends verified tax data into the tax software.

Karbon. Its integrations page does not list UltraTax CS, CCH Axcess, Lacerte, Drake, SurePrep or SafeSend. The tax-related entries it does list include Intuit ProConnect, Juno, Filed, StanfordTax, Truss, TaxBandits and TaxNow. Juno, for example, pulls client documents from Karbon, checks them and sends them to tax software.

Neither page is a complaint, and an absence on a web page does not prove an absence in the product. Vendors add connections, and a page can lag the product. What the two pages do show is that "integrates with your tax software" can mean documents move, or data moves, or a status updates, and those are three different things. Which one you get changes what your team still does by hand.

Four questions I would ask before believing "integrates"

These four questions cut through most of the marketing.

What exactly moves? Documents, client details, billing data, return status, or the figures that go onto the return. Ask for the answer in one of those words, not "data".

In which direction, and how often? A one-way push once a day is a different product from two-way and immediate. Ask what happens when the same client is edited in both places.

What has to match for it to work? Firm360's own page says client names and IDs must match exactly. That is a sensible requirement, and it means somebody owns the cleanup before the connection helps. Ask what breaks when a name has a typo.

What do my people do when it fails? Every connection fails sometimes. The useful answer is who gets told, and how.

Write the answers down for each connection you already pay for. You may find the list of things that truly move on their own is shorter than the list of things you were told connect.

Adding a layer without ripping anything out

Many firms are not looking to replace their tax package, and the survey shows why: they rate it highly. The practical question is what sits beside it to do the reading, matching and chasing that the packages leave to people.

That is the work we do. A layer like that reads documents where your team already keeps them, flags what does not match, and hands your people a short list to review. Your preparers and reviewers keep the judgment. The system takes the retyping.

It also brings a compliance question that deserves to be settled first. Once a tool outside your tax package reads client documents, the rules on tax return information apply to it. We cover that in our article on Section 7216 and AI tools. For the practical side of making a tax package and a practice management system talk, see when your practice management and tax software will not talk. The wider picture is in our guide to tax document automation for CPA firms.

FAQ

Which tax software has the best integration rating?

In the 2026 Journal of Accountancy and Tax Adviser survey, UltraTax CS led the integration question with 3.4, and ATX trailed with 2.9. The article does not publish scores for every product in text, and it does not say which programs respondents were thinking of, so treat the ranking as indicative.

Is cloud tax software easier to integrate than desktop software?

Often, because a hosted product can be reached from outside without logging into someone's server. The survey shows how split the market is: 92.3% of CCH Axcess Tax users confirmed cloud operation, while more than 94% of ATX and CCH ProSystem fx users ran the product on their own drive or network. Confirm which your firm has.

Does my practice management software update return status automatically?

It depends on the product and what it connects to. Firm360's integrations page describes document sync with UltraTax, Lacerte, Drake and CCH and does not mention return status. Check each vendor's current documentation and ask for a demonstration with your own tax package.

How much does poor integration cost a firm?

The survey does not measure it, and I am not going to invent a figure. The honest way to find out is to count, for one busy week, how many times someone retypes or re-checks something a system should have moved. Multiply by your own hourly cost.

Want to map your own connections?

If you want help mapping what actually moves between your tax package, your practice management system and your document folders, book a free strategy call. We start with a list of your current tools and what each one claims to do.

Read next: AI Automation for CPA & Accounting Firms